Thursday, February 28, 2019

Shopping Ban: Month 5 Update

It has now been 5 months since I started the shopping ban on 1 October 2018.

Some of these months have been crazier than others, for sure. This past month I was backpacking for a week, did some traveling, and did some more decluttering. I also came home with a few souvenirs from my adventures - a magnet, sticker, koozie, and tshirt. All from my trip to Phoenix or from the NOLS course. I also purchased some household items (soap, toilet paper, etc).  

As I go through my closet looking for a shirt, if I come across something I haven't worn in ages, I purge it. Same with every other area of my house. Things I'm not using need to just go. I am offloading all of the things I don't need! I find myself having an ever present box for Goodwill that I drop things into nearly daily.

I've definitely become more aware of all my purchases and can remember every little item I've purchased in the past few weeks. Every item. Before I started this journey I maybe wouldn't have thought too much about every little expense, and also maybe wouldn't have remembered every single item purchased. Now I'm so much more conscious of it. I fretted over my souvenir purchases after my NOLS course, because they didn't technically meet the shopping ban parameters (in that I wasn't international) but they are all useful. And having a use is good. I don't need any decorative nonsense without a use. 

I have very little urge to go on a shopping bender these days. What I want to do instead is learn more crafts and make gifts that people will love and cherish. I'm working on finishing a cross stitch I started during the furlough that is of Joshua Tree. After I finish that, I'm going to try my hand at quilting! There's so many fabulous patterns for quilts that look amazing and I want to try it. Doesn't seem to be a hugely expensive hobby (comparatively) but time intensive, so will keep me occupied for awhile. So more bang for my hobby buck and the outcomes are useful and all of those things are good. 

I still have a ways to go on the decluttering but it's a step by step process. So I will continue to do that. And I will keep on keeping on like I have been. 

Moving forward, I think I will modify my approach for the next 6 months. I'm going to think about it in March and lay it out more concretely, but right now my thoughts are - 
  1. NEW: Allow purchases for a cause. Example: a piece of jewelry that is handmade & supports ocean conservation. 
  2. NEW: Used clothing primarily. New clothing is okay if used is not possible, and then strive for responsibly made clothes. Sometimes technical gear like my field clothing can't be found used but if it can, then I'll go that route. But I'm still continuing to not buy anything unless it's absolutely necessary. 
  3. Household consumables still allowed as long as not duplicated (toiletries, cleaning products, pet supplies, home improvement materials, incense). 
  4. Travel souvenirs are allowed still. These are typically earrings, fridge magnets, or books from the country I'm traveling in. 
  5. NEW: Books are my weakness, so my hierarchy for reading is as follows: library, used from Thrift Books, Kindle digital version, or new as a last resort. I often come across books that are not available at the library or used, so I'm allowing Kindle books to be purchased now (limit 2 or $20 per month). As a last resort I'll buy the book new but only if all other options have been exhausted. 
  6. Purchases to replace legitimately worn out items are still allowed. 
  7. NEW: I'm nixing the pre approved shopping list. 
  8. Activities are still totally allowed and encouraged. Examples: race entry fee, dinner with friends, etc. 
  9. NEW: Fitness related purchases are allowed, IF I am replacing something worn out (like running shoes), OR repairing something that is broken (like my bike), OR trying my hand at a new sport and need equipment. 
I feel pretty comfortable with these new rules for the next 6 months but I'll review and decide for sure in the next update! 

Wednesday, February 20, 2019

Taming the Mississippi, Part 4: The Folly of Man

This is Part 4 in my Taming the Mississippi series.
Part 1: Wetlands Perceptions
Part 2: Riverine Processes
Part 3: Wetlands Values

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

“One who knows the Mississippi will promptly aver—not aloud, but to himself—that ten thousand River Commissions, with the mines of the world at their back, cannot tame that lawless stream, cannot curb it or confine it, cannot say to it, Go here, or Go there, and make it obey; cannot save a shore which it has sentenced; cannot bar its path with an obstruction which it will not tear down, dance over, and laugh at.” - Mark Twain, Life on the Mississippi

Despite humanity's best and/or misplaced intentions, nature doesn't always cooperate with what we might want her to do. Sometimes that's disastrous, sometimes that's what is needed, and sometimes we deserved the ensuing chaos. The Mississippi River is not an exception to this rule, rather it is often proving us wrong (or at least attempting to).

There's been quite a few examples of engineering projects gone wrong by natural processes that were unforeseen, or exacerbated by said man-made engineering. Settlers, Native Americans, colonizers, engineers, land owners, and nearly everyone in between has attempted to modify the way water moves in some capacity. 

And therein lies the folly - humans can try to control nature, but ultimately nature will win. In this case, the mighty Mississippi is far mightier than the best team of engineers. That doesn't seem to stop us as a whole from trying, so let's explore all the ways in which these follies have been enacted. 

In my research about the beginnings of the levee system, I discovered an article by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), which says: "Levees are the backbone of the flood control plan for the Mississippi River and Tributaries (MR&T) project. The system protects the vast expanse of the developed alluvial valley from periodic overflows of the Mississippi River." There's many eye opening things about this statement and a few things I'd like to point out. 

1) Levees being the main part of the flood control plan is clearly not an adaptive plan at all because levees are by design immovable. So that's a problem, and a one size fits all solution doesn't work in water management. 

2) The idea that the levees protect the alluvial valley from the river is completely laughable. It does not such thing. Levees protect PEOPLE from WATER, and DISCONNECTS the river from it's home alluvial valley. The alluvial valley was literally formed by the river. Alluvial comes from the world alluvium, meaning "a deposit of clay, silt, sand, and gravel left by flowing streams in a river valley or delta, typically producing fertile soil." The Mississippi Alluvial Valley (MAV) was literally formed by the river. It's as much a part of the river system as the water itself. So that's insane.

3) This concept of managing something as powerful as the Mississippi River is the true folly of all of this.

Moving on - the history of levees around the Mississippi originated as a patchwork of smaller earthen man-made levees that contained flood waters in a disjointed effort. According to the USACE, the first levees were started in the year 1717. New Orleans was but a twinkle in the eye of the French colonials, and wouldn't be founded officially until the following year. Most of the levee work was short (~3 feet tall), and done by landowners patchwork style.

In 1803 the new country of the United States bought modern day Louisiana, including New Orleans, and much of the land into the heart of the modern day country through the Louisiana Purchase. This allowed the US to double in size practically overnight and to gain control of the valuable port of New Orleans. Once the land definitively belonged to the Americans, settlement exploded. New settlers raced to settle lands, often choosing floodplain lands highly susceptible to flooding (another folly), instead of settling less susceptible lands and leaving the natural floodplain to just do important floodplain things. So these new settlers then in turn had to build levees to protect their new home lands (more folly).

Louisiana gained statehood just a few years later, in 1812, and in that short amount of time an insanely extensive system of levees had been constructed. To be fair, in the 1800s, as we discussed in Part 1, wetlands were viewed as evil and dangerous, and land was viewed as a commodity to be controlled. So modifying the landscape to meet your own perceived needs was the norm, and it follows then that building levees was the pervasive viewpoint and totally common. Hindsight is 20/20 and now we can only wonder what the coast of Louisiana would look like had the land and river been left to her own devices.

Levees evolved over time from short hand made structures a few feet tall built in the 1700s to the larger modern day monstrous levees we have today. The USACE report has a great graphic illustrating this (source):


Over and over again, year after year, flood after flood, the levees were destroyed, overtopped, breached, or ruined in some way. And reactively and predictably, whoever was in charge of managing the levee system at the time responded by building bigger, sturdier, crazier levees to contain the Mississippi's floods.

But then, in 1927, the eventuality happened. The perfect storm of rainfall and snow melt overwhelmed the system. The aptly named Great Mississippi Flood of 1927 took control.

It started in summer 1926 with heavy rains in the Midwest, and tributaries swelling to or over regular capacity. The flooding continued into the spring expanding beyond fathomable dimensions. Rivers set records that have yet to be broken to this day. For example - the Mississippi River was 60 MILES WIDE just south of Memphis TN [source] in May 1927. Personally I can't even begin to picture that it's just that insane. This trend of ever increasing water depths and widths continued through the winter of 1926 into 1927 and reached it's literal breaking point in the spring of 1927.

In April of 1927, New Orleans was receiving heavy rainfall and starting to flood several feet deep in places. At that point, a group of wealthy bankers decided something needed to be done to protect the city from more water that was coming downriver. They took matters into their own hands and dynamited a hole in the levees at the little town of Caernarvon, 13 miles downriver and southeast of the city. They flooded St Bernard Parish's more rural areas in an attempt to save the city of New Orleans. As it turned out, and probably unknown to these people, there were a few levee breaches above New Orleans around the same time.

Ultimately by the end of the 1927 flood, once waters started to recede, around 70,000 sq km (27,000 sq mi) of land was flooded during the event and 700,000 people were displaced.

In response to this massive catastrophe, politicians passed the Flood Control Act of 1928 which essentially gave the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) the power to try to tame the Mississippi. Levees were built, floodways created, water was channeled and the whole thing was called Project Design Flood. The USACE built the Bonnet Carre Spillway (completed in 1931), the Old River Control Structure (completed in 1953), and the Morganza Spillway (completed in 1954). Seemingly flooding was controlled.



Seemingly.

In 1937, only 10 years after the 1927 Flood, the USACE's newly built structure at the Bonnet Carre Spillway were put to the test when the bays were opened for the very first time. The Bonnet Carre structure was built at the site of the Bonnet Carre Crevasse, a levee breach that opened up in 1871 above the city of New Orleans. They repaired the levee years later but then created the spillway at the site of the breach. The location is fantastic in my opinion because it channels fresh river water into marshes and into Lake Pontchartrain where it can offset saltwater intrusion and nourish the surrounding wetlands. But that's another story. The spillway is designed to relieve river flooding pressure on New Orleans, to essentially protect the city.

The next major Mississippi River flood was in 1973. By this time the Old River Control Strucure (ORCS) and the Morganza Spillway had both been completed and they are both in the same general area between Vicksburg MS and Baton Rouge LA.

The ORCS is designed to divert a set amount of river water from the Mississippi into the Atchafalaya at all times, with the intention of keeping the Mississippi in it's current channel. USACE studies have shown that left to its own devices, the Mississippi would change course from its current channel to the Atchafalaya's channel, as it is the shorter route to the Gulf of Mexico. Rivers changing course is a totally natural process but would create many problems for society if it happens. So the ORCS is designed to keep the river locked into it's channel and to keep the Atchafalaya with a certain amount of water.

The Morganza Spillway is the other part of that river control network, and is high and dry far away from the river the majority of the time. It's designed to be used in times of extreme flooding to divert water away from the Mississippi and into the Atchafalaya River, to bypass the downriver cities of Baton Rouge and New Orleans.

The 1973 flood was the biggest test of the USACE river control system since the 1927 flood. It was the largest volume of water since then, and both the Bonnet Carre and Morganza Spillways were opened. Winter precipitation in the Midwest, followed by high volumes of spring rainfall, and then winter snow melt all compounded to this historical flooding. The pressure on the ORCS was so strong that the structure nearly failed entirely - the base started to erode and the concrete was damaged. The structure held out and the Mississippi did not change course, but it was a closer call than anyone would have liked.

All the structures ultimately survived the 1973 flood, barely, and damages were repaired for future use.

The next major flood was in 2011. The first time the Morganza Spillway was opened in my lifetime was during this 2011 flood. It has only been opened twice in its history so this was quite the spectacle. We watched the live news footage of them opening the gates and the water rushing through. PBS has a nice short video if you'd like to watch it for yourself (here). 

Yet again flood waters were funneled into the Atchafalaya Basin via the Morganza, down the Atchafalaya River via the ORCS, into Lake Pontchartrain via the Bonnet Carre, and down the course of the Mississippi River via the USACE levee system. This has become the modus operandi in flood events, and will likely become more frequent (if you ask me).

The idea that we as humans can control natural processes as mighty as the Mississippi River is the folly part of the whole scheme. Nature wins, nature always wins, and it may take awhile but nature will likely win in this scenario too at some point. There's legitimate concerns that the next big flood could bring down the ORCS. That would mean the Mississippi could abandon it's own home channel and would likely commandeer the Atchafalaya's channel. The potential consequences of all of this are wide-ranging, enormous, unfathomable, catastrophic, and possibly inevitable.

I'll discuss the ways in which nature has fought back across the Louisiana coast and in particularly what the River has done in response to human intervention in upcoming part(s) of this series!

Sources & Additional Readings:
History of the Lower Mississippi Levee System US Army Corps of Engineers, accessed 2/18/2019
History of Levee Building on the Mississippi River Climate-policy-watcher.org, 12/4/2018
The Louisiana Purchase Wikipedia, accessed 2/18/2019
Caernarvon, Louisiana Wikipedia, accessed 2/18/2019
Great Mississippi Flood of 1927 Wikipedia, accessed 2/18/2019
Mississippi flood of 1973 Wikipedia, accessed 2/20/2019
Project Design Flood Wikipedia, accessed 2/20/2019
Morganza Spillway is Opened PBS NewsHour via YouTube

Monday, February 18, 2019

A Letter to Aldo Leopold

Dear Aldo,

I just finished reading A Sand County Almanac for the second time in my life. I read it the first time in college, when it felt like required reading. I retained a sense of wonder from it, but not much else. I recently started a quest to read a conservation related book every month and February 2019 was your classic work. This time round, I learned so much more. Possibly because I chose it out of my own free will instead of a sense of obligation. Possibly because I am more in tune with the world around me and my own role and sense of identity than I was years ago. Possibly also because I care more deeply than I did before, if that is possible.


This past week was spent with a group of women who shared very similar ideals to me, in the broad sense, though we all gathered from very different backgrounds and life histories. As we backpacked through the Galiuro Wilderness, I kept hearing your voice in the background, whispering to me about the value of wilderness and respect for the land, and the importance of every aspect of the community. My personal sense of wonder at the land I was exploring was only enhanced by thoughts of how you would perceive the area. Would you have enjoyed it in the same way that I did? Am I capable of the deep reflection and care for this land that you had for your sandy farm? Do I truly understand what it means to be a human, aware and responsible of my surroundings, and can I do the best possible work to achieve the best possible future for our lands?


I hope so. I hope that everything I am trying to do would make you proud. I hope that my conservation efforts are not in vain. I hope that by appreciating wilderness and public lands and doing it in a nonconsumptive way will support the cause so that others in the future may also have that ability and luxury. The land is not mine. It is not ours. As you say, we belong to the land, the land does not belong to us. Being a part of the community is valuable, in an intangible and hard to describe way. Economic value is not the only value worth having.


This past week in the wilderness definitely left me with a sense of awe. I had private conversations with the wind, the trees, the birds, the rivers, and the rocks. I gently touched Douglas firs and manzanitas as I hiked, saying hello and also thanking them for their presence. I felt the heat emanating from the red rock as I summited a mountain. Rock that had been there for thousands of years, simply standing the test of time, and I was lucky enough to be party to its presence and enjoy some warmth and greetings from them.


I feel very grateful for the lessons of respect your writings have instilled in me. I can only imagine what I will learn from you when I dive further into your works and life lessons. It’s difficult for me to fathom what else you might have accomplished after A Sand County Almanac, and though I cannot know for sure what it could have been, I am confident that the world is a little worse off for your departure.


Thank you for imparting wisdom on me and to anyone who has been fortunate enough to find your writings, and anyone perceptive enough to fully absorb them as I feel I have. It’s truly transformative and I am inspired by your dedication to journaling and essays, and I hope I can commit to doing that in my own life in the way that you have. Thank you for everything!

Friday, February 8, 2019

Zero Waste update 2.0

I realized earlier that I never did outline my zero waste goals, as alluded to in my shopping ban announcement post. I have a few problem areas that I am trying to address, and I'm acknowledging in advance that I will probably not make it to completely zero waste in the next few months. But I can do as much as possible!!!


1. Cat litter boxPreviously I had been using standard cat litter in my cat's box. I have always felt so wasteful with it. I found walnut shell pellets at the local shop and transitioned my cat over to those. He doesn't really seem to care and uses it just fine! The main problem I had with regular litter is that I felt so wasteful just throwing it all in the trash. But with these walnut shell pellets I can scoop his box, put it in a pail, and put it in my compost bin! NOTE: I do not put my compost on any kind of food producing garden so I don't have to worry about some sort of contamination to food stuffs. I'm a terrible gardener. I just compost to deal with my own kitchen scraps instead of letting the landfill deal with it.



2. Cat food bagsMy cat is on a very specialized diet for his chicken allergy and kidney problems. It's made by Royal Canin and turns out that Terracycle does a Royal Canin recycling program for the packages! Win! I haven't actually mailed any of my bags in yet but I'm stockpiling and knowing that I have a place for them is comforting.


3. Bathroom products - contacts, toothpasteTerracycle also wins here too. They have various mail-in programs for contact containers & contacts themselves, and for toothpaste tubes & toothbrushes. Check it out!


4. Subway cups
Subway fixed this for me!! The other day when I went in there (my once weekly lunch spot) they had reusable cups! $2.99 for the cup up front, then half price drinks for all of 2019. So even getting a combo, my drink part of that will be cheaper. So I'll save money eventually, though that's not really the important part. I'll be using fewer plastic cups! I can recycle them but better to not use them in the first place.

Friday, February 1, 2019

Taming the Mississippi, Part 3: Wetlands Values

Part 1: Wetlands Perceptions
Part 2: Riverine Processes

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We've discussed how wetlands have been perceived through time, across eras, and by different communities of people. We've discussed just how rivers work and build land and talked specifics of the Mississippi River in both cases. Next logical step is the value of wetlands. Intrinsic, economic, recreational, commercial, ecological, and everything in between.

In the past (as discussed here) wetlands have been essentially abused. They've been logged, drained, filled, channeled, and destroyed in all manner of ways. All for the "good" of society. But it wasn't really for the good of the people but at the expense of the people. It just took us all these years to discover the true values of wetlands.

Everything is interconnected. Dredging a canal over there could allow salt water to intrude into a fresher water marsh over here and change the entire species community over time.  Building levees blocks off the natural flow of water and may actually cause worse flooding, just in other and maybe unintended areas. The point is - we as humans have a habit of tinkering with a system that we don't fully understand before we even have a chance or take the time to fully understand it. The same with wetlands. We now understand the full values of the resources we have drastically altered, but often that information doesn't get relayed to the general public. So here's my shot at relaying all this!

Value 1: Water Filtration
Wetlands are a network of stems, leaves, and root masses. As water flows into a wetland, it's naturally slowed down by that network. As the water moves more slowly, sediments that were suspended in the water column begin to drop out and settle on the wetland surface instead of riding along the current. Larger sediments drop first (like sand) and smaller finer sediments drop last (like clay). The slower the water moves the finer the sediments that settle out.

Sediment trapping in this process is vital to wetland health. Wetlands naturally subside (compress or compact) over time, and the influx of fresh sediment naturally offsets that so that wetlands can maintain their elevation. Without accretion of sediments, wetlands sink and as a result are flooded more often because of the lower elevation. Increased flooding impacts plant health and eventually the wetland will just sink away and cease to exist. So when wetlands get access to water to remove sediment, its a win-win. Wetlands get fresh sediment, and the water gets to carry less material.

Not only do wetlands allow sediments to settle out by slowing water down, they also absorb nutrients from the water. The stems and leaves of wetland plants are capable of absorbing nutrients like nitrogen and phosphorous. Nitrogen and phosphorous commonly end up in riverine systems because they prevalent in agriculture areas. Phosphorous is used in most fertilizers and applied to crops and farms regularly. Nitrate is a form of nitrogen that also a byproduct of fertilization. Natural levels of nutrients can be absorbed by plants and regular levels of algae, but the excess in nutrients causes problems downstream.

The Mississippi River drains 41% of the United States, including nearly all of the Midwest, which has a very high concentration of farming and agriculture. Nutrient rich water in this region runs off the land, into streams and rivers, and ultimately into the Mississippi. That water flows down river into the Gulf of Mexico. All the extra nutrients in the water is a food source for phytoplankton, which leads to rapid population growth. This process of increased nutrients leading to algal blooms is called eutrophication. In the hot summers the water of the Gulf gets quite warm, nutrient levels are high, and algae blooms rapidly and unchecked, dissolved oxygen in the water is depleted, marine life cannot survive, and ultimately we end up with a "dead zone". Historically, nutrient levels were not nearly as high as they are in modern times. Fertilizing for agriculture, manure runoff, and sewage all find their way into the river. It's too much for the system to handle naturally anymore and we end up with these crazy complications like the ever larger Gulf of Mexico Dead Zone.

Furthermore, historically water from the mighty Mississippi would have spread out and flowed across wetlands more gradually before ending up in the Gulf of Mexico. In the natural system, river water would get filtered, and the wetlands would get access to nutrients and sediment. These days, the river is channeled rather narrowly straight into the Gulf with limited connected flow, and even that flow is highly managed. As a result, wetlands don't get access to river water nutrients and sediment as much as historically, and river water doesn't get filtered naturally by the wetlands either.  It's a lose-lose for the river and the wetlands.

Value 2: Storm Surge Protection and Buffering
It's difficult to put an economic value on an environmental service like storm surge reduction. There's many factors that go into play. What are the areas being protected? If it's coastal New Jersey versus a tiny community that's a vastly different economic amount, but still important protection either way. How much infrastructure damage was avoided? That includes roads, bridges, maybe oil and gas infrastructure, homes, businesses, etc. How many homes did not flood because of the storm surge reduction? If 1000 homes were at risk, but now 750 are now protected then that's a huge benefit (I made these numbers up for easy comparison).

The rule of thumb from an US Army Corps of Engineers report is that storm surge is reduced by 1 foot for every 2.7 miles of marsh. That's a round number but many things influence whether that is true or not (like wind speed, storm speed, wind direction, precipitation, marsh health...). It's definitely situation and location dependent. But if we just ballpark and say 1 foot of storm surge is reduced for every 3 miles of marsh, then we still need a substantial amount of healthy contiguous marsh. Storm surge from hurricanes can often reach 15-20 feet high, so if we have a 15 foot storm surge we need 45 miles of marsh or more to fully absorb that surge and provide adequate protection.

Besides extreme storm surge events from named hurricanes, wetlands also absorb water from more regular high water events. In Louisiana, the Mississippi River has several diversions where water can be diverted from the river to the surrounding wetlands. That has a variety of benefits, but this is done to relieve flooding stress on levees and cities. These outlets funnel water into the wetlands where it is slowed down and absorbed. Water moves much slowly through a wetland ecosystem than a channeled river. Wetlands also absorb precipitation, overflow from rivers/bayous/creeks with natural boundaries, and any other surface water. They are effectively sponges.

Reduction in wetlands surrounding populated areas has many negative effects, many of which are only realized many years later when it's far too late to resolve immediately. I talked about this some in Part 1: Wetlands Perceptions. But in this regard, the shorter distance from cities to open water is detrimental, particularly during hurricane season. Water simply has nowhere to go and is forced into human society instead of being completely or primarily captured by the natural wetlands.


Value 3: Fisheries
Wetlands play a vital role in fisheries, though it may not seem like it to the casual observer. Many species of marine (as in offshore) fish come inland to spawn in wetlands, because wetlands provide cover, protection, and food for young fish before they head back out to their marine homes. "Over 75% of Louisiana’s commercially harvested fish and shellfish species are dependent on wetlands. Coastal wetlands provide valuable breeding, spawning, feeding and nursery grounds for many of these species at some point during their life cycles" (source).

Young fish and shellfish may feed on algae, plant matter, insects, other young fish, and the detritus (partially decomposed plant matter) present in the wetlands. Each species has different needs and the buffet offered up by wetlands is bountiful. As an example, small fish such as menhaden eat plant detritus. Bigger fish (tuna, trout, drums) may eat menhaden. Continuing with menhaden as my example, they are also food source for wildlife.

Admittedly I'm not much of a fisheries person myself, but I do know that without wetlands to provide habitat and cover for spawning, many species would be severely impacted. That would have a chain effect for fisheries, commercial and recreational fishing, and Louisiana's economy.

Value 4: Migratory Bird Habitat
Migratory birds worldwide use a system of routes, called flyways, to get from breeding grounds to wintering grounds and back again. The Mississippi River delta and alluvial valley overall is part of the Mississippi Flyway. Birds that winter in South America and breed in Northern Canada (and every midway distance in between) may use that to cross over the Gulf of Mexico. The coastal wetlands and barrier islands of Louisiana are important on the northward migration because they are literally the first land many birds meet after crossing the Gulf. If you time it right, and you bird watch from the beach in Grand Isle LA, you can see many species of birds diving into the first available vegetation as they finish the water crossing. As wetlands deteriorate and recede, the crossing becomes just that much longer.

Related barrier islands, which are part of the coastal wetlands system, provide critical habitat in the same manner. The disappearance of those vital strips of land is a whole other set of issues that I won't discuss in depth here. But suffice to say that loss of wetlands makes it harder for migratory birds as they land on their northerly journey.

Even with wetlands presence, habitat quality may suffer. There's a big difference between a happy healthy salt marsh full of native plants and a shrubby degraded patchy semi-wetland. If habitat suffers, then the whole food chain is probably suffering. Everything is interconnected. Birds that use this migratory flyway include everything from hummingbirds, songbirds, raptors such as my fave the swallow-tailed kite, waterfowl, and waterbirds.

And that's only migratory birds! There are also many resident species that use wetlands, including our relatively new nonmigratory experimental population of Whooping Cranes. There's also rails, waterbirds, and more that don't migrate and call Louisiana's wetlands home year round. Protecting, conserving, and managing habitat for migratory birds also will automatically encompass the needs of nonmigratory birds as well. 


Value 5: Recreational Opportunities
There's a reason that Louisiana is called Sportsman's Paradise - we are flush in outdoor recreational opportunities of the aquatic kind. Hunting, fishing, swamp tours, offshore fishing, kayaking, even kayak fishing. The opportunities for recreation in the coastal wetlands are vast. 

Hunting is a big deal here, and waterfowl is probably the most common type of hunting taking place in Louisiana's wetlands. It's a big deal when the first teal start to show up in August and September because winter is coming! Avid duck hunters wait excitedly for this time of year and every hunter I know will keep records, report retrieved bands, buy ammo and guns, buy gear, buy duck stamps/WMA permits/hunting licenses. Hunters pay taxes (11% on guns/ammo, for example) that directly funds wildlife and habitat conservation and management through programs like the Pittman-Robertson Act. Hunters have to buy federal duck stamps, and nearly 98% of that money goes directly to the Migratory Bird Conservation Fund, which uses that money to create, expand, and manage National Wildlife Refuges. So money from hunting goes directly to protecting wildlife habitat, so it's a self fulfilling system in a way. Hunters are the original conservationists - they want to hunt wildife, so they want to conserve habitat and the species in the long term to protect the species, habitat, and sustainable hunting opportunities.

But waterfowl hunting isn't the only hunting taking place. There's waterfowl, deer, hogs, alligators in a strict season, nutria... It's practically a buffet out there. Responsible population management will provide hunting opportunities for interested people, keep populations to a manageable level, and bring in money from taxes and sales.

Fishing is also a big deal. I talked some above about fisheries and habitat, but commercial and recreational fishing is a big market. People travel from all over to go on a guided fishing trip in the wetlands of Louisiana. People fish inland and offshore, for speckled trout and red snapper, guided or not, in a motorized boat or kayak, and in any number of ways. Commercial fishing is also important because it is an important part of our economy. According to Louisiana Seafood, the industry is worth $2.4 BILLION annual for Louisiana's economy (source). That includes shrimp, oysters, crabs, crawfish (that's farmed & wild caught), and alligator (farmed and wild caught). The seafood fishing industry is built into the culture, the diet, the festivals, and the mentality of the coastal population.

Summary
As you can see there are so many ways to value wetlands. It's difficult to put an exact monetary value on something like storm surge protection, but you can put an economic value on the house that didn't get destroyed because of the extra 10 miles of wetlands providing protection. It's not exactly a black and white system, but more wetlands = more benefits. There's really no downside to more wetlands. You just can't have too many wetlands. So no matter which aspect of these few that I listed you value the most, providing for that value often provides for all the other values. It's similar to managing for a keystone species in wildlife ecology. If you want to provide habitat for migratory birds and don't much care about alligator hunting, you'll still provide alligators with good habitat by providing habitat for migratory birds. They use different parts of the wetlands but both benefit from habitat conservation or restoration. More wetlands please!


Additional Reading and Sources:
Water Filtering of Wetlands National Park Service, accessed 1/25/2019
Fertilizer Runoff Overwhelms Streams and Rivers--Creating Vast "Dead Zones" Scientific American, 3/14/2008
Eutrophication Wikipedia, accessed 1/25/2019
Dead Zone (Ecology) Wikipedia, accessed 1/25/2019
Nitrogen and Water USGS, accessed 1/25/2019
The Gulf of Mexico Dead Zone Carleton College, accessed 1/25/2019
What Causes Ocean "Dead Zones"? Scientific American, accessed 1/25/2019
How Do Wetlands Filter Water? Sciencing.com, accessed 1/25/2019
Cleaner Water The Wetlands Initiative, accessed 1/25/2019
Louisiana Coastal Wetland Functions and Values LAcoast.gov, accessed 1/25/2019
Menhaden Wikipedia, accessed 1/25/2019
Storm Surge Reduction by Wetlands accessed 2/1/2019
Wetlands Provide Hundreds Of Millions Of Dollars In Storm Protection Fast Company, 10/2/2017
Understand - Conserving Coastal Wetlands for Sea Level Rise Adaptation NOAA, accessed 2/1/2019
Wetlands and barrier islands: Our communities’ first line of defense RESTORE, accessed 2/1/2019
The Value of Wetlands in Protecting Southeast Louisiana from Hurricane Storm Surges E Barbier et al, 2013, PLOS One
Mississippi Flyway Wikipedia, accessed 2/1/2019
Mississippi Flyway Audubon, accessed 2/1/2019
Pittman-Robertson Act Wikipedia, accessed 2/1/2019
Duck Stamp Dollars at Work US Fish and Wildife Service, accessed 2/1/2019
Whooping Cranes Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, accessed 2/1/2019
Louisiana Seafood Industry Louisiana Seafood, accessed 2/1/2019
What Does the Economy Stand to Lose If We Don’t Restore Louisiana’s Coast? RESTORE, accessed 2/1/2019
Coastal Wetlands: Too Valuable to Lose NOAA Fisheries, accessed 2/1/2019
Louisiana seafood industry's economic impact compared to other states NOLA.com, 3/11/2013
Value of Wetlands The Wetlands Initiative, accessed 2/1/2019
Why are Wetlands Important? EPA, accessed 2/1/2019

Conservation Book of the Month, February 2019 - A Sand County Almanac, Aldo Leopold

The February book of the month is A Sand County Almanac by Aldo Leopold. Read it along with me and join the conversation on Goodreads!

Shopping Ban: Month 4 Update

It has now been 4 months since I started the shopping ban on 1 October 2018.
Parameters of my shopping ban
Month 1 Update
Month 2 Update
Month 3 Update

If December was weird, then January has been downright bonkers. The government is STILL SHUT DOWN, I'm still furloughed, and that led to some house projects I'd been meaning to do. So despite the lack of income, I did spend some money, but accomplished some of my list!

Things I purchased in January
- Toiletries
- fabric to make den curtains [on the approved items list!]
- 4 used books [OC books]
- stick vacuum for all the dog hair [on the approved items list!]

I maybe didn't need to buy the 4 used books however I only spent $17 and they're all conservation related which is allowed.

Since I had all this furlough time on my hands, I remodeled my den this month, which was ~$900 spent in materials but way more in equity to my house. House improvement stuff is also in the allowed category. My house is 60 years old - home improvement is necessary and will happen. In the process I trashed the old makeshift curtains and curtain rod, so had to replace both of those. I bought fabric to make new curtains, and that is the second item off my approved list I've bought! Pretty good considering that list is pretty short.

After the remodel, since I have considerably less carpet now and the same amount of dog hair, I finally ordered a stick vacuum since that's way better for tile/wood flooring than my regular vacuum. That's also an item on my approved shopping list, which makes 3 now purchased.

In regards to the approved item list, I'm nixing the prints for existing frames category. I used the frames and put prints I already had in them. 1 is a piece of art I bought in Greece, and the other is a piece of art my friend made and sent to me.

So after 4 months here's an updated list:

Updated Approved Item List:
Prints for existing wall frames - nixed
Smart thermostat for the house - no real desire at the moment to upgrade
NOLS course supplies that are required for the course - 1 item left to purchase
fabric to make curtains - purchased
stick vacuum for all the dog hair - purchased

So February is coming up quick and hopefully the government shutdown will end before I write the next update about Month 5...